Software QA Process Review & Strategy for Start-ups and Small Businesses
Build Quality Into Your Workflow — Without a Full-Time Testing Team
Small teams can’t afford to guess when it comes to testing. With 25+ year of experience in software testing and QA we help you assess, optimize, and level-up your QA strategy so your software releases are faster, cleaner, and less stressful — even without a full QA department.
How it Works?
Step 1 — Submit Your Request
Fill out the simple evaluation form at the bottom of this page and tell us what you need help with.
Step 2 — Review & Clarification
We’ll carefully review your details and reach out if we need any extra information to make sure we fully understand your situation.
Step 3 — Clear, No-Obligation Quote
Once everything is clear, we’ll provide you with a tailored, no-obligation quote that outlines the steps to achieve your desired outcome.
That’s it — no hidden steps, no pressure. Just a straightforward process designed to give you clarity and confidence before we start working together.
What’s Included
Who This is For?
• Start-ups with no QA team.
• Dev teams doing their own testing.
• Founders and micro and small business owners worried about quality bottlenecks.
• Agencies building client apps with no formal testing process.
Case Study
Client: A small software development company with a 4-person dev team
Challenge:
The team had no QA team. Developers were testing their own code, which led to bugs slipping into production and frequent hotfixes after releases. Stress was high, deadlines were slipping, and the founder worried about customer churn.
Solution:
We conducted a Software QA Process Review & Strategy Sprint, including:
- Audited their release flow and existing test practices.
- Identified gaps in test coverage.
- Ran a manual vs automation fit analysis (what should be automated, what should stay manual).
- Created a lightweight QA roadmap tailored to their team size and budget.
- Coached their junior dev on writing effective test cases.
Outcome:
Within 6 weeks, they reduced production bugs by 40%, cut release-day firefighting in half, and felt confident launching updates on schedule. The founder decided they didn’t need to hire a full-time QA yet, saving around $80,000 per year in staffing costs.
